How The Silna Brothers "Robbed" The NBA for $800 Million

Imagine walking away with nearly 800 million dollars from an NBA team you did not even own.

That is exactly what happened to two brothers from New Jersey.

Ozzie Silna and Daniel Silna turned a struggling ABA franchise and a one million dollar investment into one of the greatest long term deals in sports history.

The wildest part is that their team has not played a game since 1976.

To understand how this happened, you have to rewind to 1974.

The Silna brothers were not sports executives. They were businessmen who had just sold part of their polyester manufacturing company and were looking for their next opportunity. At the time, professional basketball was split between two leagues. The National Basketball Association was established and steady. The American Basketball Association was flashy, creative, and trying to compete.

The ABA had a red, white, and blue basketball. They popularized the three point line. They featured stars like Julius Erving, better known as Dr. J, who brought style and athleticism to the game.

The Silnas decided to buy in. They purchased the Carolina Cougars for one million dollars. Soon after, they moved the team to St. Louis and rebranded it as the Spirits of St. Louis.

On paper, the move made sense. At the time, St. Louis was the largest U.S. city without a professional basketball team. On the court, the Spirits were entertaining. They had young talent like Maurice Lucas and Marvin Barnes filling the arena with high level play. A young Bob Costas even called their games from the broadcast booth.

But while the team showed promise, the league itself was collapsing. The ABA was bleeding money and struggling to survive. By 1976, a merger became inevitable.

The NBA agreed to absorb four ABA teams: the Denver Nuggets, Indiana Pacers, San Antonio Spurs, and New York Nets. The remaining franchises were offered buyouts to fold. The Kentucky Colonels accepted three million dollars to disappear. Other teams simply shut down.

The Silna brothers were offered money as well.

Most owners would have taken the guaranteed payout and walked away. Three million dollars in 1976 was serious money, equivalent to tens of millions today.

But the Silnas saw something others did not.

Instead of accepting a one time check, they worked with their lawyer Donald Schupak to negotiate a different kind of deal. They did not ask for entry into the NBA. They did not demand equity in a franchise.

They asked for a share of television revenue in perpetuity.

At the time, this sounded almost pointless. The NBA was not yet a global entertainment machine. Finals games were sometimes shown on tape delay. Broadcast deals were modest. Michael Jordan had not entered the league. The billion dollar contracts were nowhere in sight.

Many thought the Silnas were crazy.

Their agreement gave them one seventh of the television revenue share allocated to the four former ABA teams, which worked out to roughly 57 percent of a full team’s media cut. And it would last forever.

In the early years after the merger, nothing dramatic happened. The checks were modest. It may have even looked like a mistake.

Then the 1980s arrived.

Magic Johnson and Larry Bird reignited the league with a rivalry that captivated America. Ratings climbed. Interest grew. The NBA found new life.

In the 1990s, Michael Jordan elevated the game to a global spectacle. His dominance with the Chicago Bulls transformed basketball into a worldwide brand. Television deals exploded in value.

With each new broadcast contract, the Silnas’ payments increased.

In 1997, the NBA signed a 2.6 billion dollar broadcast deal. In 2002, another massive agreement followed. By the early 2000s, the Silna brothers were reportedly collecting around 20 to 25 million dollars per year from games they had no operational involvement in.

Their franchise had vanished decades earlier. But their clause had not.

From 1976 to 2014, they earned an estimated 180 million dollars from television revenue alone. When the NBA negotiated another massive media deal in 2014, the league decided it was finally time to close the chapter.

The final buyout was reportedly around 500 million dollars.

When it was all said and done, the Silna brothers walked away with close to 800 million dollars tied to a team that had not played since 1976.

This was not luck. It was foresight.

While other owners chose immediate certainty, the Silnas chose uncertain upside. They did not tie themselves to a single franchise. They tied themselves to the future growth of professional basketball and the power of television.

Most people bet on what exists today. The Silnas bet on what the league could become tomorrow.

If you were in their position in 1976, would you have taken the guaranteed three million dollars, or would you have gambled on the future of the NBA and the rise of media?

‍